Dbx driverack 260 manual espaР“В±ol Patch#
Dbx driverack 260 manual espaР“В±ol full#
Dbx driverack 260 manual espaР“В±ol series#

All the crossover EQ settings for the mains and matrices should be restorable with a snippet with the faders down to prevent signal from passing even if there are matrix sends in a loaded scene. The subs, and two stereo row mixes can be assigned to the matrices, and the mains would be run off the main outputs as usual. I won't do the speaker controlling in a desk.too risky for my taste.This is true, and to be honest I haven't had opportunity to explore the issue thoroughly, however between making certain parameters safe from recall and by using a snippet to restore anything that can't be 'safed' I'm sure a reliable process can be determined.Р”Р‡or starters you need to use the matrices rather than groups for the crossover output controls, which aren't generally used in mix scenes. Once you load a different mixing scene, with different X-Over settings or no settings at all, you might damage your speakers. Have been unable to find any sort of pricing on their units. I will test drive one of their units soon, the sound quality of AD/DA quality and plugins is I mailed ALLDSP but received no reply yet. The Prism range for example also has 64РµСљвЂ 4 Dante, which we have no use for, so most of the money for Prism would be thrown away.

Dbx driverack 260 manual espaР“В±ol series#

Would love to go for their Prism series because of it's scalability, but I'm afraid it's financially out of our reach. The Jupiter range is affordable and appears to be more user friendly + more flexible than Xilica. I have been delving into Symetrix the past couple of days and I must say their gear looks promissing. So the M32 will be our plan B and I'm still game for a dedicated speaker manager in plan A. And with digital all-in-one solutions I always feel more vulnerable in the way that you loose the complete system if something goes wrong.

(Non-professionals at our location, that's the way it is.) Also it's easier to replace a fader or pot on an analogue mixer. Our room has different people operating the gear, and digital might be to complicated for some. On the other hand, I would love to keep the mixer analogue.

Dbx driverack 260 manual espaР“В±ol Patch#

Do you happen to know if it's possible to patch a seperate EQ + limiter + delay line on every output? And possibly a decent LPF for subwoofer use? The manual is not that clear. We were going for a new analogue 16 channel Midas anyway, so that M32 might just be the way to do it. We're not going to invest in Behringer because we need reliability for daily use and years to come.

I've mixed a few surround venues with M32's, for a mixer that isn't purpose-designed for surround they work pretty well.Good idea AC2SPL.

Dbx driverack 260 manual espaР“В±ol full#

They have all the speaker management you need on 14 outputs (24db/oct crossovers, delays, limiters, EQ, etc), full iPad control, definitely way better prepared for surround sound too. Perhaps you should consider replacing your current mixer with an X32 Rack/Producer/Compact. Or you could buy my Xilica XP4080 with ethernet card -) f.e.->Р”Р„ll the same stuff inside from a German company-> 'All DSP'.

You can get the non DANTE Versions from other vendors as well. There are smaller versions with only six outs and without DANTE too. control by ipad / smartphone / over wifi would be a big helpР”В®verything you asked for besides feedback suppression-> 4 stereo outputs (perhaps another 2 stereo outs later on) Needless to say: sound quality is important

I have been looking at DBX Driverack and Xilica XP4080 solutions, are there any alternatives? A quick Google search solicited a lot of brands and makes that I never heard about (Better Music Builder, Marani etc.) We're planning our new common room sound installation, and need guidance concerning the speaker management.